Legal Opinion
BRT General Corp. v. Water Pollution Control Authority
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 29, 2003No. SC 16927PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this appeal1 is whether the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdic*116tion over the plaintiffs’ mandamus action because they had failed to exhaust the administrative remedies provided in General Statutes §§ 22a-430 (f),2 22a-4363 and *11722a-437.4 The plaintiffs, BRT General Corporation and Forest Walk, LLC,5 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, which had denied their application for a writ of mandamus to direct the defendant, the water pollution control authority of the town of Middlebury, to consider their application to “connect”6 to the town’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Gordon v. TobiasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Clark v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- ST. PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC. v. KuehlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Piteau v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.