Legal Opinion
Wright v. Woodridge Lake Sewer District
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 26, 1991No. 14004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court mistakenly declared a sewer ordinance invalid in the absence of a sufficient factual record. We conclude that the trial court should not have come to this conclusion without hearing the factual evidence offered by the defendants in support of the validity of the ordinance. We therefore reverse the judgment declaring the sewer ordinance null and void and remand the case for a new trial.
The factual and procedural matrix of the case, as found by the trial court, is not in dispute. The plaintiffs are owners of approximately 8.26 acres of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Blue Sky Bar, Inc. v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- City Council v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Town of Glastonbury v. Metro. Dist. Comm'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.