Legal Opinion

Budkofsky v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 29, 1979PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.

Following a hearing, the defendant commissioner concluded that the plaintiff, the owner of a Mack truck, had failed to register it in Connecticut in violation of General Statutes § 14-12 (a). As a result, the defendant ordered the suspension of the plaintiff’s right to operate his truck on the roads and highways of the state of Connecticut. See General Statutes § 14-111. The Court of Common Pleas affirmed the decision of the commissioner and the plaintiff appealed to this court.

The defendant commissioner found the following pertinent facts: The plaintiff owns a Mack truck which is registered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Balch Pontiac-Buick, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Charlton Press, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Kelly v. DeweySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Ryszkiewicz v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Plourde v. LiburdiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Gaynor v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API