Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Goudie
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1972No. 5914, 5915 and 5887PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
These appeals and cross-appeal present issues arising out of contractual agreements between Winifred M. Goudie (hereinafter Goudie) and Sears, Roebuck and Company (hereinafter Sears), and also between Goudie and Climate Conditioning Corporation (hereinafter Climate). Gou-die contracted with Sears for the purchase and installation of a heating system including adequate furnaces and ductwork which would also be sufficient for later use in connection with air conditioning. The system was to be installed in a building owned by Goudie and used partially as a private…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Barrett Co. v. Panther Rubber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Riley v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Material Supply International, Inc. v. Sunmatch Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Bay General Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Mark Keshishian & Sons, Inc. v. Washington Square, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.