Legal Opinion

Bay General Industries, Inc. v. Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1980No. 11894PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge:

Appellants Bay General Industries, Inc. (“Bay General”), a Maryland Corporation that manufactures electronics components, and its chief officers, Arthur and Frieda Houseman, seek reversal of the trial court’s December 17, 1976 order (entered at the close of appellants’ evidence) dismissing their action requesting $150,000 damages, primarily in the form of lost profits, for unlawful detainer, fraudulent conversion, and intentional interference with the execution of a replevin writ. 1 The action was originally brought in replevin, for return of a punch press that,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Sorrells v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., Miller & Rhoads, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Nepera Chemical, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API