Legal Opinion

Stott v. Johnston

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1951No. S. F. 18222PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Alleging a breach of warranty by reason of the sale of defective paint for use in his business, plaintiff, a painting decorator, recovered judgment upon a verdict against defendant Thomas Johnston, doing business as Johnston Paint Company, in the sum of $10,000. On appeal, defendant argues: (1) that the evidence was insufficient to establish any liability on the part of defendant; and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the amount of damages awarded. An examination of the record in the light of applicable principles of law leads to the conclusion that the judgment should be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API