Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Plaintiffs brought suit against but one defendant, the Express Company. The order, from which plaintiffs appeal, discharged that sole defendant “from any and all liability” to the plaintiffs. Thus there ended the plaintiffs’ action against the only person they had sued. As the district judge said in his opinion, the effect of the order is that, “for all practical purposes,” the Express Company has become “merely an indifferent bystander.” 1 [95 F.Supp. 744.] Such an order clearly seems, on its face, final and appealable. But the Express Company argues that it is not…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- In re Saco Local Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- State of West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Acha v. BeameCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.