Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 28, 2016No. 1 CA-SA 15-0271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge:

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 12-2108 (Supp. 2015) and the provisions of Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 7 (“Rule 7”) that track this statute limit the amount of a bond a party must furnish to stay the enforcement of, or execution on, a judgment. The dispositive issue in this special action is whether the statute and the matching provisions in Rule 7 bar a superior court from taking other steps to preserve the status quo or the effectiveness of a judgment it has stayed pending appeal. We hold they do not.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Gotthelf v. FickettArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Center for International Environmental Law v. Office of the United States Trade RepresentativeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kresock v. Gordon Ex Rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. AOR Direct LLC v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Aor v. Hon bustamante/buteoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API