Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 12-2108 (Supp. 2015) and the provisions of Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 7 (“Rule 7”) that track this statute limit the amount of a bond a party must furnish to stay the enforcement of, or execution on, a judgment. The dispositive issue in this special action is whether the statute and the matching provisions in Rule 7 bar a superior court from taking other steps to preserve the status quo or the effectiveness of a judgment it has stayed pending appeal. We hold they do not.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Gotthelf v. FickettArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Center for International Environmental Law v. Office of the United States Trade RepresentativeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kresock v. Gordon Ex Rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- AOR Direct LLC v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Aor v. Hon bustamante/buteoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016