Mahar v. Acuna, II
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal concerns an order restricting the right of the appellant, Hector Acuna, to possess a firearm. The trial court issued this formal order, which was entitled “Notice to Sheriff of Positive Brady Indicator” (here after “Brady notice”), 1 along with an order of protection in favor of the appellee, Gina Ma-har, after a hearing at which both parties testified. On appeal, Hector maintains the court erred by entering the Brady notice without finding a sufficient legal basis to support it. Because we agree the firearms restriction is either unsupported…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Hill v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- LaFaro v. CahillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Bell v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
3Cited by18 opinions
- City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Savord v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Michaelson v. GarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In Re $15,379 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Moreno v. BeltranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.