Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1951No. 5233PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves simply a matter of statutory construction. The question presented is whether attorneys’ fees are included within the term “all damages” as-used in Section 12-503, A.C.A. 1939, a statute first enacted half a century ago,. R.S. 1901, Secs. 277,. 278.

Since the instant case grows out of a prior action in which the same parties were involved, we deem it essential to set forth the background giving rise to this appeal. Under the terms of Section 12-503, supra, one John S. Crozier, a Wins-low taxpayer, instituted an action against various state officers and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O. S. Stapley Co. v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Austin v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ackerman v. KaufmanArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Avery v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Jacobson v. Laurel Canyon Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API