United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frohmiller
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
This appeal involves simply a matter of statutory construction. The question presented is whether attorneys’ fees are included within the term “all damages” as-used in Section 12-503, A.C.A. 1939, a statute first enacted half a century ago,. R.S. 1901, Secs. 277,. 278.
Since the instant case grows out of a prior action in which the same parties were involved, we deem it essential to set forth the background giving rise to this appeal. Under the terms of Section 12-503, supra, one John S. Crozier, a Wins-low taxpayer, instituted an action against various state officers and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- O. S. Stapley Co. v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Austin v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Ackerman v. KaufmanArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Avery v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1900
- Jacobson v. Laurel Canyon Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.