United States v. Means
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of committing sodomy and an indecent act, in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to *161confinement for 2 years and 3 months, total forfeitures, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence but suspended confinement in excess of 2 years. The Court of Military Review affirmed. 20 M.J. 522 (1985).
This Court granted review of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Ernest A. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. William Peters, Richard F. Ellis, and Peters Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Richard L. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Archie Albert Lavallie, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. MeansU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. WelchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. CorraineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. PagelU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. ShafferCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.