Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Means

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 29, 1985No. CM 445986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WERNER, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a court-martial composed of members of committing consensual heterosexual sodomy and other indecent, lewd and lascivious conduct1 in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934 (1984) (UCMJ). The court sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years and three months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence but suspended for one year the confinement term in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. BoatnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. RussellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. LohrmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. FaggU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. SanchezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API