Legal Opinion
United States v. Pagel
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided August 12, 1994No. ACM 30185PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*774OPINION OF THE COURT
YOUNG, Judge:
Court members convicted appellant of one specification of attempting to commit carnal knowledge with, two specifications of committing sodomy with, and two specifications of committing indecent acts upon, a minor. Articles 80, 125, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 925, and 934 (1988). The court members sentenced appellant to a bad-eonduet discharge, confinement for 8 years, and reduction to E-3. Appellant alleges the military judge made six errors: (1) admitting dysfunctional family profile evidence; (2) excluding evidence of the victim’s prior sexual history…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. PagelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. BarrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. LloydUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. ConwayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. HopkinsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.