Legal Opinion
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 11, 2000No. 99-421CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Chief Judge.
This case is currently before us on defendant Bonneville Power Administration’s (Bonneville or BPA) motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds the complaint of plaintiff, Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (Puget), disputing construction costs of the Pacific Northwest AC Intertie. Defendant’s motion is granted. However, in lieu of dismissal, the complaint is to be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
I. Background of the Dispute
Puget Sound is primarily a public utility, providing energy to residential and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Public Utility District No. 1 of Clark County v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Forelaws on Board v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- City of Burbank, California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp, and Portland General ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Vanalco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Naskar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America Administration, Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.