Vanalco, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This matter, before this court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss, involves a power sales contract between Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville or BPA) and Vanal-co, Inc. (Vanalco). In this litigation, plaintiff Vanalco alleges BPA’s failure to offer it the same amendments as it did to other utilities constitutes a breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fan-dealing. On August 8, 2000, Vanalco moved for expedited proceedings to resolve the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. The court agreed to implement an expedited schedule. On…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Frymire v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- McNabb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.