Legal Opinion
Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp, and Portland General Electric
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2002No. 01-15449PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
The opinion filed April 16, 2002 is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 5765, in the first full paragraph, the fourth sentence that begins “TANC cannot obtain state law money-damages ...” is amended to read: “TANC cannot obtain state law money damages allegedly resulting from the operation of an interstate electricity intertie expressly approved by FERC, where the manner of operation was necessarily contemplated at the time of approval.”
At slip opinion page 5766, in the first full paragraph, the fifth sentence that begins “Offering an analogy of our…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Coll v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Kwai Fun Wong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Kwai Fun Wong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.