Legal Opinion
Forelaws on Board v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1983No. 82-3257PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether, under the unusual judicial review provisions of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 839-839h (Supp. V 1981) (the Regional Act), a petition for review of a final agency action should have been filed initially in this court rather than in the district court.
Plaintiffs-appellants, an environmental protection group and one of its members, appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs challenged the execution by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- City of Rochester v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Public Power Council v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Crown Simpson Pulp Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Forelaws on Board v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Forelaws On Board v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Pacific Power And Light Company v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.