Legal Opinion
Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America Administration, Bonneville Power Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 17, 2002No. 00-71276PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge.
In this petition for review, we are asked to determine whether the Bonneville Power Administration (the “BPA”) followed required procedure in making certain charges in association with sale of -the use of electric transmission lines to Petitioner Puget Sound Energy Inc. (“Puget Sound”). Before we may answer that question, however, we must determine whether the petition was brought within the statutory period for raising such challenges. In turn, answering this question requires us to consider the nature of the actions challenged by Puget Sound —…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Del Puerto Water District v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Falen Gherebi v. George Walker Bush Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Prawoto v. PrimeLendingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Nez Perce Tribe, Warm Springs Tribe Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Idaho State of Oregon, Petitioners-Intervenors, Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Public Power Council, Respondent-Intervenor. Sierra Club Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associaton Institute for Fisheries Resources Idaho Rivers United, Inc., Pacific Northwest Generating Company (Pngc), Blachly-Lane County Cooperative Electric Association (Oregon) Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Oregon) Clearwater Power Company (Idaho) Consumers Power, Inc. (Oregon) Douglas Electric Cooperative (Oregon) Fall River Rural Electric Bpa No. Cooperative, Inc. (Idaho) Lane Electric Cooperative (Oregon) Lost River Rural Electric Cooperative (Idaho) Northern Lights, Inc. (Idaho) Okanogan County Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Washington) Raft River Rural Electric Cooperative (Idaho) Salmon River Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Idaho) Umatilla Electric Cooperative Association (Oregon) West Oregon Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Oregon), Intervenors v. Bonneville Power Administration, Public Power Council, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.