Legal Opinion
Hairston v. Re: Leasing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 4, 1985No. 0548PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
This case involves a workers’ compensation claim brought by the respondents for death benefits for the deceased worker, Floyd Hairston. The single Industrial Commissioner, the Full Commission and the circuit court have approved an award in compensation for Hairston’s death. The two parties who were ordered to pay the benefits, Re: Leasing, Inc., (Leasing) and Jim Moore Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc., (Jim Moore), and their insurance carriers, have appealed. We affirm.
The primary question is whether Hairston was the statutory employee of both Leasing and Jim Moore as found by the Commission and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Boseman v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Carrier v. Westvaco Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
- Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Abbott v. the Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Olmstead v. ShakespeareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.