Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 21, 1984No. 0083PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is a Workers’ Compensation claim brought by the respondent, David G. McLeod. The hearing Industrial Commissioner, the Full Commission and the Circuit Court have approved an award in compensation for McLeod’s injury. The employer, Piggly Wiggly, and its insurance carrier have appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

No award under the Workers’ Compensation Law is authorized unless the employer-employee or master-servant relationship existed at the time of the alleged injury for which claim is made. Alewine v. Tobin Quarries, 206 S. C. 103, 33 S. E. (2d) 81…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Tharpe v. G. E. Moore Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Alewine v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  5. Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Gray v. Club Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Lumbermen's Underwriting AllianceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Lake v. Reeder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Dawkins v. JordanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API