Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Chief Judge:
Samuel Terran Neese (Neese) appeals from the circuit court’s order concluding that Neese’s action against Michelin Tire Corporation (Michelin) was barred by the exclusivity provision of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act. We affirm.
I
In 1991, Neese was employed as a truck driver by Vanguard Services, Inc. (Vanguard), an interstate trucking company. Prior to December 1991, Vanguard and Michelin entered into a contract whereby Vanguard agreed to transport certain semi-finished products and packaging materials to and from Michelin’s various facilities. Paragraph ten…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Abbott v. the Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Olmstead v. ShakespeareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Voss v. Ramco, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.