Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
In this negligence action, Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) argues the Court of Appeals’ erred in affirming the trial court’s decision to strike the defense of statutory employer from Dow’s answer. We disagree and affirm in result.
Factual/Procedural Background
This case involves tort claims against Dow by Henry W. Glass and Gregory T. Shelnutt (“Workers”). Dow manufactures a chemical compound known as Sarabond, a mortar additive. Sarabond was added to mortar used in constructing facade panels for a building at the Medical University of South Carolina (“MUSC”). When the panels began…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Ost v. Integrated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Hairston v. Re: Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- White v. J. T. Strahan Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Gray v. Club Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Lake v. Reeder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Abbott v. the Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.