Legal Opinion
USX Corp. v. Adriatic Insurance Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 2000No. Civ.A. 95-866PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking indemnification under approximately 278 umbrella and excess policies of insurance for financial losses in excess of $593,118,-296.92, which plaintiffs incurred as a result of the settlement/satisfaction of nine civil suit judgements entered against Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company (“B & LE”) based upon its participation in a twenty-year conspiracy to violate federal and state antitrust laws. A case management order was entered on January 14, 1997, which divided this action into four phases, the first of which was…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Usx Corporation v. Adriatic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Melrose Hotel Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. JunglingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Selective Way Insurance v. Hospitality Group Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.