Legal Opinion
Melrose Hotel Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 2006No. Civil Action 05-3467PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCHILLER, District Judge.
The Melrose Hotel Company (“Mel-rose”) hired a third-party vendor to send faxes advertising Melrose’s hotel rooms to various travel groups. The Travel 100 Group, Inc. (“Travel 100 Group”) filed a class action lawsuit (“Travel 100 Complaint”) against Melrose in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. According to the Travel 100 Complaint, Melrose’s unsolicited fax advertisements to Class members violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Melrose notified its insurance carrier, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- American Automobile Insurance v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. LayIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.