Legal Opinion
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Jungling
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 18, 2002No. 00-1474PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Chief Justice.
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company (Grinnell) appealed from a district court declaratory ruling that the company was obligated to indemnify its insured, Henry C. Jungling, Jr., under a personal excess liability policy for a settlement payment Jungling’s corporation made in a fraud suit against Jungling and his corporation. Grinnell contended that the district court erred in concluding that (1) the terms of the policy provided coverage, (2) public policy did not bar coverage, (3) Jungling was legally excused from complying with the notice provisions of the policy, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Ambassador Insurance Company v. MontesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Henschel v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Thomas v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh v. Terra Industries, Inc. Terra Nitrogen, (Uk) Limited, Terra Industries, Inc. Terra Nitrogen, (Uk) Limited, Counter Claimants-Appellees v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, CounterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.