Legal Opinion

United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 10, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-245-JRRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, District Judge.

This declaratory judgment action was brought by United Sweetener, USA, Inc. (“United Sweetener”) and Holland Sweetener Co., Vof (“Holland Sweetener”), seeking among other relief a declaration of the invalidity of two patents for sweetening compositions, U.S. Patent No. 3,492,131 (“the ’131 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 3,780,189 (“the ’189 patent”). These two patents are the property of the defendant, Nutrasweet Co.

In our opinion of March 22, 1991 (“Nutrasweet /”), 760 F.Supp. 400, we disposed of cross-motions for summary judgment on Count III of the complaint and a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Erbamont Inc. v. Cetus Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  4. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  5. United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  2. Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. Xerox Corp. v. 3Com Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  4. GPAC, Inc. v. D.W.W. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  5. Delaware State University Student Housing Foundation v. Ambling Management Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API