Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. Steinberg
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff Gruntal & Co., Inc. (“Gruntal”) against defendants Ronald Steinberg and Carolyn Steinberg (the “Stein-bergs”), for declaratory judgment as to Gruntal’s obligation to arbitrate and a permanent injunction against arbitration. Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332.
By opinion and order, filed 12 October 1993, an application by Gruntal for a preliminary injunction against arbitration was granted (the “Preliminary Injunction”). 1 See Gruntal & Co., Inc. v.…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Trippe Manufacturing Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Niles Audio Corporation, a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,173, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2803 Kevin Miller v. Dr. Charles W. FlumeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. v. North End 49ers Sandbridge Bulkhead Groups A, B and CSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Fitzgerald v. Shore Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Mm&s Financial, Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Nasd Dispute Resolution, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.