Legal Opinion
Xerox Corp. v. 3Com Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1999No. 97-CV-6182TPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Xerox Corp. (“Xerox”), alleges that the defendants willfully infringed and continue to infringe on U.S.Patent No. 5,596,656 (the “ ’656 patent”) held by Xerox. By Decision and Order dated September 29, 1998, this Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granted the plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment, finding that the patent at issue is not invalid for prior public use.
After this Court’s decision was rendered, defendants filed a request for reexamination of the ’656 patent in litigation by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kaufman Company, Inc. v. Lantech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- GPAC, Inc. v. D.W.W. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Murata MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Soverain Software LLC v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
- MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.