Legal Opinion
Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. Steinberg
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-4323 (AJL)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff Gruntal & Co., Inc. (“Gruntal”) against defendants Ronald Steinberg and Carolyn Steinberg (the “Stein-bergs”), for declaratory judgment as to Gruntal’s obligation to arbitrate. Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332.
Currently before the court is the issue, raised by Order to Show Cause entered 29 September 1993 (the “Order to Show Cause”), of whether the court should grant Gruntal a preliminary injunction enjoining arbitration in this matter pending…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Corliss v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Sierra Equity Group, Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Delaware State University Student Housing Foundation v. Ambling Management Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.