Legal Opinion
Raad v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 2004No. S-10718PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nada I. Raad claimed that the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District discriminated and unlawfully retaliated against her by not hiring her for any of thirty-one teaching positions. The Alaska State Commission for Human Rights dismissed her discrimination complaint. Raad appeals a superior court decision affirming the commission’s dismissal. Because there was some evidence that the explanations offered by the school district for not hiring Raad were pretextual, and because it is not clear from the record whether the commission adequately considered…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ignatius G. ANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Bullington v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Nada Raad v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Miller v. Safeway, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Peterson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Edward Tuohy v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Villaflores v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.