Legal Opinion

Villaflores v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2007No. S-12309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Clarito Villaflores applied for a job with an Anchorage public utility and was not hired. Villaflores filed a complaint with the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, alleging that he had been discriminated against based on his age and race. The commission, through staff, determined that Villaflores's complaint was not supported by substantial evidence because the utility hired an applicant of the same race and age class as Villaf-lores, and because Villaflores was not qualified for the job. In seeking reconsideration, Villaflores did not dispute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gary Millbrook v. Ibp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. Yellow CabAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Raad v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Grundberg v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Villaflores v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API