Legal Opinion

Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2014No. 6871 S-14357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska State Commission for Human Rights dismissed Gregg Conitz's complaint against his employer, Teck Alaska Incorporated, alleging discrimination in its promotion decisions. The superior court dismissed Conitz's appeal as moot, finding that the same claims had already been decided by a federal court and that the doctrine of res judicata would therefore preclude further pursuit of the claims if they were remanded to the Commission. Conitz appeals. We affirm the superior court's decision.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Over the last seven years, Gregg…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State, Dept. of Natural Resources v. Alaskan Crude CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Keven Windel and Marlene Windel v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Strong v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Billy Dean Smith and Jacob Lee Anagick v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API