Legal Opinion

Edward Tuohy v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 2015No. A14A2148PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

Edward Tuohy filed a complaint against the City of Atlanta, Mayor Kasim Reed, and the Atlanta City Council (collectively “the City”), alleging that he was terminated in retaliation in violation of the Georgia Whistleblower Act, OCGA § 45-1-4. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the City, and Tuohy now appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm.

On appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this court applies a de novo standard of review. Higginbotham v. Knight, 312 Ga. App. 525, 526 (719 SE2d 1) (2011). Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Debano-Griffin v. Lake CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. FieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Pitts.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. Franklin v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Murray-Obertein v. Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. Harris v. City of Atlanta.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. COWARD Et Al. v. MCG HEALTH, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API