Legal Opinion

State v. Abrams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1974No. 73-587PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Neill,, C. J.

Seven propositions of law are presented by appellant in this appeal. One, relating to appellant’s motion for diminution of the record in the Court of Appeals, is moot as a result of the granting of that motion by the Court of Appeals. Of the other six propositions of *55law, only one was assigned as error in the Court of Appeals, briefed and considered by that court.

This court is not required to ‘ ‘ consider a claim of error that was not raised in any way in the Court of Appeals and was not considered or decided by that court.” Toledo v. Reasonover (1965), 5 Ohio St. 2d 22, 213 N.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. City of Toledo v. ReasonoverOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. GrisafulliOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. United States v. Theodous McNairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 1987

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API