Legal Opinion

State v. DeMarco

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1987No. 86-612PublishedCited by 401 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

I

Our first inquiry concerns the trial court’s admission, over objection, of evidence relating to other alleged acts of misconduct by appellant, involving different automobiles. Appellant’s counsel filed a motion in limine which requested that the prosecutor be prohibited from presenting evidence of alleged acts of misconduct other than those charged in the indictment. Pursuant to this motion, the court ordered that the prosecutor address the court at a sidebar conference at any time he intended to bring in “any evidence pertaining to similar acts.”

During appellant’s trial, the court permitted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by401 opinions

  1. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004

396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API