Legal Opinion

City of Toledo v. Reasonover

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1965No. 39447PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaut, C. J.

In effect, the Court of Appeals has held that the trial judge abused his discretion in imposing as severe a sentence upon defendant as he did.

In our opinion, the Court of Appeals cannot hold that a trial court abused its discretion by imposing too severe a sentence on a defendant convicted of violating an ordinance where the sentence imposed is within the limits authorized by the applicable ordinance and statutes and there is nothing in the record to indicate whether defendant had a past criminal record or what his driving record was or that the trial court in sentencing defendant did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API