Legal Opinion

State v. Lytle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1976No. 76-143PublishedCited by 667 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

Celebrezze, J.

In propositions of law Nos. 1, 2 and 3 appellant alleges he was denied a fair trial and substantial justice due to the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Appellant’s claim should be viewed in the light of an unusual series of events which occurred prior to the date set for trial.

Lytle plead not guilty to all charges on October 2, 1974. On that date he was represented by attorney Larry B. Morris, who had been appointed on September 23, 1974. On October 18, 1974, Morris filed motions to suppress appellant’s statements and certain physical evidence. On October 25, 1974,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by667 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001

662 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API