Ingram v. Johnson

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

As we understand, from the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the appellee was entitled to the fund in question, not because she was the named beneficiary and that the insured had no right to change same ordinarily, but tbe change or assignment made by him to his daughters was invalid because he had previously given or assigned the policy to said Ida Johnson which was without consideration, and that said assignee or donee had no insurable interest in the life of the insured, Oscar Morgan. In other words, the question we are called upon to decide is the soundness of the…