National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This is a suit upon a policy of insurance on the life of Henry Alexander and in which appellee was the beneficiary named therein.
The pleadings were in short by consent, etc.
The question of insurable interest was presented by the testimony for appellee that the assured was the “cousin of Hobart Alexan-' der.” Insurance contracts are void in the absence of an insurable interest — this being the result of public policy as to such matter to prevent such wagering contracts. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co. (Ala. Sup.) 142 So. 37; National Fire Insurance…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Helmetag's Adm'r v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Commercial Fire Insurance v. Capital City InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. Mobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Rountree v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. MiddlebrooksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
- Metcalf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.