McDonald v. McDonald

On the former appeal (212 Ala. 137, 102 So. 38, 36 A. L. R. 761), tlie sufficiency of the claims filed by these appellees, and the propriety of their inter-pleading in this proceeding, were fully considered and sustained.

Counsel for appellant present a forceful argument for a review and recantation of some of the grounds of decision on that appeal — especially as to the sufficiency of the facts relied on to effect an equitable substitution of the appellees for the appellant, as the rightful beneficiaries under the policy. But our examination of the'opinion of Mr. Justice Sayre, which clearly…