Jennings v. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The interpleader was to determine conflicting claims to the proceeds of a life insurance policy presented by the intervention of contending parties.
It is declared that the statute to that end aims to provide for a speedy, less expensive remedy, in lieu of a bill of interpleader in equity. McDonald v. McDonald, 212 Ala. 137, 102 So. 38, 36 A.L.R. 761. In such suit it is the duty of the court to work out the interests of the claimants to the money on principles recognized in law and equity. Gunter & Co. v. Bankers Mortg. Bldg. & Loan Ass’n., 232 Ala. 95, 167 So. 266.
The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Helmetag's Adm'r v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Slaughter v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Pfingstl v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Feely v. LaceyMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Hyde v. StarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.