Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Not being prohibited by law or public policy, a contract of life insurance, being a chose in action, may before loss be assigned to one having an insurable interest in the life of the assured, without the consent of the insurer, unless it contains a stipulation to the contrary, or by which the right of assignment is limited. McDonald v. McDonald, 215 Ala. 179, 182, 110 So. 291; 37 C. J. 422 et seq.; Colebrooke on Collateral Sec., § 426; Helmetag’s Adm’r v. Miller, 76 Ala. 183, 52 Am. Rep. 316; Ala. Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Mobile Mut. Ins. Co., 81 Ala. 329, 1 So. 561; Haase v. First Nat. Bank,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Helmetag's Adm'r v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. Mobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Taylor v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.