Legal Opinion

Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1931No. 2 Div. 983PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Not being prohibited by law or public policy, a contract of life insurance, being a chose in action, may before loss be assigned to one having an insurable interest in the life of the assured, without the consent of the insurer, unless it contains a stipulation to the contrary, or by which the right of assignment is limited. McDonald v. McDonald, 215 Ala. 179, 182, 110 So. 291; 37 C. J. 422 et seq.; Colebrooke on Collateral Sec., § 426; Helmetag’s Adm’r v. Miller, 76 Ala. 183, 52 Am. Rep. 316; Ala. Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Mobile Mut. Ins. Co., 81 Ala. 329, 1 So. 561; Haase v. First Nat. Bank,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Helmetag's Adm'r v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. Mobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Taylor v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API