Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1934No. 4 Div. 694PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

In 1926, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of New York insured the life of complainant in the sum of $5,000 by issuing two. policies, each for $2,500. They provide that, if insured before he reaches the age of 60 should become totally and presumably permanently disabled, the company thereby waived payment of subsequent premiums and became obligated to pay to him a disability income, aggregating $50 per month, during the continuance of such disability. The death benefits were payable to his personal representatives.

At that time insured was indebted to the Bank of New…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Helmetag's Adm'r v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. Mobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. BridgeforthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Guntersville v. BainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Rountree v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. The First National Bank of Birmingham, Alabama, and Sindey M. Amith, Executors of the Estate of Henery M. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. Henderson v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Matthews v. StroudSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API