Legal Opinion
Application of Heritage
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 22, 1945No. Patent Appeal 5018PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 13, 15, 19, 20, 21, and 25) in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a method of producing porous coated fiber boards.
Claims 1, 4, 13, and 15 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:
“1. The method of producing a porous coated fiber board by coating a porous fiber board having fibers with undesired color qualities with a coating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Don Lee, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- In Re CooperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re WahlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Shao Wen YuanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re AbramsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re FullamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981