Legal Opinion
Application of Shao Wen Yuan
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 3, 1951No. Patent Appeal 5776PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
By this appeal reversal is sought of the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner, hereinafter referred to as the examiner, of the two claims, numbered respectively 8 and 9, remaining in the application after it, during a protracted prosecution in the Patent Office, had , been amended in various particulars, including the withdrawal of many claims. It appears that The Glenn L. Martin Company of Baltimore, Maryland, as assignee of the application, is the actual party in interest.
The application…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re AbramsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Jacobs v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Job Reynolds Larry Holliday, and Holiday Steel Rule Die CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Walter D. Bernhart and William A. FetterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.