Legal Opinion

In re Wagenhorst

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 24, 1933No. Patent Appeal No. 3059PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

The appellant filed his application in the United States Patent Office on April 2,1927, for a patent on improvements in automobile wheels. This application was stated to be a division of appellant’s pending application, serial No. 41,835, filed July 6,1925. Appellant claims the latter date as his effective filing date as regards this divisional application.

In the letter of the Examiner of May 23, 1928, Putnam, No. 1,612,050, of December 28, 1926, was cited as a reference. Thereafter appellant filed an affidavit under rule 75 of the Patent Office, which affidavit was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re TuckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  2. In re SchneiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Southgate v. GreeneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  4. Mas v. RootCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re BergyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. In re RubinfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In re Honeywell, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  5. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API