In Re Cooper
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of all of the claims, 1 to 4 inclusive, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 15, of an application for a patent for alleged new and useful improvement in “High Speed Tool Steel”.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter involved and reads as follows:
“1. A high speed tool steel containing more than 3% of each of the carbide-forming elements chromium, tungsten, molybdenum and vanadium, said carbide-forming elements being in such relative…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Becket v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- In re PillingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In re GillettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re BecketCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- In re LothropCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Application of Shao Wen YuanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of BennerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In Re AbramsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of Alvin E. NehrenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of TanczynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.