Legal Opinion

In Re Cooper

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1943No. Patent Appeal 4706PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of all of the claims, 1 to 4 inclusive, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 15, of an application for a patent for alleged new and useful improvement in “High Speed Tool Steel”.

Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter involved and reads as follows:

“1. A high speed tool steel containing more than 3% of each of the carbide-forming elements chromium, tungsten, molybdenum and vanadium, said carbide-forming elements being in such relative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Becket v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. In re PillingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. In re GillettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. In re BecketCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  5. In re LothropCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of Shao Wen YuanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of BennerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In Re AbramsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Application of Alvin E. NehrenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  5. Application of TanczynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API