Moore v. U.S. Dep't of State
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
When deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court may consider only the complaint itself, documents attached to the complaint, documents incorporated by reference in the complaint, and judicially noticeable materials. EEOC v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch. , 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997). Relevant here, the Court may consider Moore's EEO documents. See Bowden v. United States , 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (considering "the pleadings and undisputed documents in the record" while reaching the merits on a *88motion to dismiss); Vasser v. McDonald , 228 F.Supp.3d 1, 11 (D.D.C. 2016)…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- ARGUELLES v. NIELSENDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2023
- Ahuruonye v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Cafarella v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Davila v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.