Legal Opinion
Pinson v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2012-1872PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion in the Alternative for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint; Denying as' Premature Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion for Discovery; Appointing Pro Bono Counsel
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge ¡
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Jeremy Pinson claims that her 1 constitutional rights were violated when Bureau of Prisons (BOP) officials retaliated against her for exercising her First Amendment rights. The DOJ — on behalf of the defendant-officials —…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Harrison v. Fed. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bailey v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Buckles v. EUBA Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Buckles v. EUBA Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.