Legal Opinion
United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 26, 1996No. 96 Civ. 5313 (RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in a private civil antitrust damages action, In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation (hereafter, “Plaintiffs”), have moved to intervene or appear as amici in this civil action (the “Government Action”) brought by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the “DOJ” or the *534“Government”). Plaintiffs seek to compel filing and publication of a “Settlement Memorandum” (and all evidentiary materials referenced therein) prepared by the DOJ and to challenge a provision of the proposed Consent Decree in this action.
For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BleznakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.